LogFAQs > #932310741

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why Is California's All Gender Restroom Law Sexist?
_AdjI_ 01/01/20 1:08:15 AM #21:	faramir77 posted... Gendered single occupant bathrooms are mindnumbingly pointless. There's a toilet and a sink in it. One person allowed at a time. Why does it matter which is male/female? Eeyup. I get the rationale of taking the approach TC's seeing (building a third bathroom is expensive, slapping a unisex sign on the former men's room while leaving the women's room is consistent with how busy each gendered bathroom tends to be), but really, all single-seater bathrooms should just be unisex. <cite>_AdjI_ posted [p:932310741] in Why Is Cal... [t:78296592]...</cite> <quote>faramir77 posted... </cite> <quote>Gendered single occupant bathrooms are mindnumbingly pointless. There's a toilet and a sink in it. One person allowed at a time. Why does it matter which is male/female?</quote> Eeyup. I get the rationale of taking the approach TC's seeing (building a third bathroom is expensive, slapping a unisex sign on the former men's room while leaving the women's room is consistent with how busy each gendered bathroom tends to be), but really, all single-seater bathrooms should just be unisex. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1