LogFAQs > #932053732

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	it should be illegal to discuss jesus or bible in the class roo
OniRonin 12/25/19 6:42:48 PM #46:	LinkPizza posted... Other people arent directly paying the school. Just taxes. how do you think schools are funded? why does it matter that it goes through taxes? `But why do you think we should only learn about stuff where people are paying taxes. Thats ridiculous.` i already explained why, several times, including in what you quoted `Does that mean if that school has a high paying donor, they should learn only classes that donor wants the children to learn about?` no, unless nobody else is willing to contribute to the school at all `Because thats what it sounds like you saying.` what did I say that implied that? `And what about private schools closely connected with churches?` this topic is about the distribution of public funds. private schools can teach about religious stuff if they want Also, why does it matter if churches pay taxes. i already explained why, several times, including in what you quoted `The point of learning a little about religion isnt to co very the kids.` I don't understand what this means `Its to teach them about different things like different religions, for example.` plenty of other interesting things to teach the kids about If you want to live in a world without free speech, you go right the fuck ahead. what did i say that cuts against free speech The rest of us will do our best to live in a world without. tyrannical king who stops us from learning because he doesnt like whats being taught. ad hominem And SKARDAVNELNATE is probably saying what hes saying because it sounds like you only care about money. what did I say that implies I only care about money It sounds like you want people to have to pay for certain things to be taught is school. And thats a bad idea. What if a company decided to pay massive taxes I'm pretty sure at this point that you are intentionally misunderstanding me. I never said that paying more in taxes should get you more control over the curriculum. Just that you should have to pay taxes to have a seat at the table. . Does that mean they should be able to have all history classes replaced with a history of the company? Because if theyre paying massive taxes, we should be learning about them, according to you plan... please stop accusing me of saying things I never said. If you can't argue against my actual claim, just go post about video games or soemthing. --- http://boomeressentials.com/.well-known/ https://essentialboomer.guide/robots.txt #NotAllGamers #YesAllLandlords <cite>OniRonin posted [p:932053732] in it should ... [t:78281170]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Other people arent directly paying the school. Just taxes. </quote> how do you think schools are funded? why does it matter that it goes through taxes? But why do you think we should only learn about stuff where people are paying taxes. Thats ridiculous. i already explained why, several times, including in what you quoted Does that mean if that school has a high paying donor, they should learn only classes that donor wants the children to learn about? no, unless nobody else is willing to contribute to the school at all Because thats what it sounds like you saying. what did I say that implied that? And what about private schools closely connected with churches? this topic is about the distribution of public funds. private schools can teach about religious stuff if they want <quote>Also, why does it matter if churches pay taxes. </quote>i already explained why, several times, including in what you quoted The point of learning a little about religion isnt to co very the kids. I don't understand what this means Its to teach them about different things like different religions, for example. plenty of other interesting things to teach the kids about <quote>If you want to live in a world without free speech, you go right the fuck ahead. </quote> what did i say that cuts against free speech <quote>The rest of us will do our best to live in a world without. tyrannical king who stops us from learning because he doesnt like whats being taught.</quote> ad hominem <quote> And SKARDAVNELNATE is probably saying what hes saying because it sounds like you only care about money.</quote>what did I say that implies I only care about money <quote> It sounds like you want people to have to pay for certain things to be taught is school. And thats a bad idea. What if a company decided to pay massive taxes</quote> I'm pretty sure at this point that you are intentionally misunderstanding me. I never said that paying more in taxes should get you more control over the curriculum. Just that you should have to pay taxes to have a seat at the table. <quote> . Does that mean they should be able to have all history classes replaced with a history of the company? Because if theyre paying massive taxes, we should be learning about them, according to you plan...</quote> please stop accusing me of saying things I never said. If you can't argue against my actual claim, just go post about video games or soemthing. --- http://boomeressentials.com/.well-known/ https://essentialboomer.guide/robots.txt #NotAllGamers #YesAllLandlords</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1