LogFAQs > #932052416

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	it should be illegal to discuss jesus or bible in the class roo
OniRonin 12/25/19 5:57:48 PM #44:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... It's about funding schools. Teaching about religions doesn't lead to school funding because religions don't contribute to taxes. Thus resources spent on that activity are a net loss of resources. I'm looking at what other subjects that is true for. Is the expense spent on PE programs made up for by the taxes collected from professional athletes? Is the expense spent on teaching history made up for by the taxes collected from historians. It's not just a matter of whether taxes are collected. It's also a matter of much was spent on the program and how much the program resulted in collected more taxes. Likewise, if the school shouldn't teach a subject with a net loss of resources then the school should have programs that lead to a net increase in resources. Thus my suggestion. ok. can you explain how 'schools should not teach things that are a net loss of resources' logically follows (e.g., don't just say they're similar or spring from the same kind of politics, give me a set of logical steps) from the claim i'm making in this topic? if not, please make your own topic to discuss your idea. --- http://boomeressentials.com/.well-known/ https://essentialboomer.guide/robots.txt #NotAllGamers #YesAllLandlords <cite>OniRonin posted [p:932052416] in it should ... [t:78281170]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>It's about funding schools. Teaching about religions doesn't lead to school funding because religions don't contribute to taxes. Thus resources spent on that activity are a net loss of resources. I'm looking at what other subjects that is true for. Is the expense spent on PE programs made up for by the taxes collected from professional athletes? Is the expense spent on teaching history made up for by the taxes collected from historians. It's not just a matter of whether taxes are collected. It's also a matter of much was spent on the program and how much the program resulted in collected more taxes. Likewise, if the school shouldn't teach a subject with a net loss of resources then the school should have programs that lead to a net increase in resources. Thus my suggestion.</quote> ok. can you explain how 'schools should not teach things that are a net loss of resources' logically follows (e.g., don't just say they're similar or spring from the same kind of politics, give me a set of logical steps) from the claim i'm making in this topic? if not, please make your own topic to discuss your idea. --- http://boomeressentials.com/.well-known/ https://essentialboomer.guide/robots.txt #NotAllGamers #YesAllLandlords</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1