LogFAQs > #932052299

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topicit should be illegal to discuss jesus or bible in the class roo
SKARDAVNELNATE
12/25/19 5:53:51 PM
#43:


OniRonin posted...
this does not follow at all from what i said.
It's about funding schools. Teaching about religions doesn't lead to school funding because religions don't contribute to taxes. Thus resources spent on that activity are a net loss of resources. I'm looking at what other subjects that is true for.

Is the expense spent on PE programs made up for by the taxes collected from professional athletes?
Is the expense spent on teaching history made up for by the taxes collected from historians.

It's not just a matter of whether taxes are collected. It's also a matter of how much was spent on the program and how much the program resulted in collecting more taxes.

Likewise, if the school shouldn't teach a subject with a net loss of resources then the school should have programs that lead to a net increase in resources. Thus my suggestion.

---
No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD.
Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1