LogFAQs > #931467672

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Survivor: Island of the Idols Discussion Topic #3: We are thankful for Noura
wg64Z 12/12/19 10:14:24 AM #294:	Because of Dean, Karishma went out, Elaine went out, Chelsea went out, Kellee went out, and all of them were more interesting characters. Sounds like a great reason for a jury to vote him as the winner. As for the Dan thing, I don't want the production crew to burn in a fire or to have Survivor cancelled over this. Yes, they should have acted sooner and because they didn't, someone else was harmed. That is BRUTAL. However, you also had Missy and Liz LYING about it on camera. So "Believe her always" can go both ways. In this case however it was very clear early on Dan was a scumbag. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't production ask Kellee if they wanted her to remove him or if she wanted to handle it herself? Then they did step in and talk about boundaries and to Dan specifically...and he STILL did something scummy, instant boot justified. I don't think you should immediately eject someone based on an accusation without some kind of investigation, however Survivor did have taped evidence. I'm torn, but I have to think that production did the best they could with what they knew. There is no possible way they thought it was a good idea to keep him on if everything they heard was true, there needed to be some due diligence. Plus I'm sure Dan is massively lawyer'd up and probably swung that leverage around as much as he possibly could. --- Do you like humor, gameplay, and daily content? Check out my hilarious let's play Youtube Channel, Tarvould's Quest! https://www.youtube.com/TarvouldsQuest <cite>wg64Z posted [p:931467672] in Survivor: ... [t:78205816]...</cite> <quote>Because of Dean, Karishma went out, Elaine went out, Chelsea went out, Kellee went out, and all of them were more interesting characters. Sounds like a great reason for a jury to vote him as the winner. As for the Dan thing, I don't want the production crew to burn in a fire or to have Survivor cancelled over this. Yes, they should have acted sooner and because they didn't, someone else was harmed. That is BRUTAL. However, you also had Missy and Liz LYING about it on camera. So "Believe her always" can go both ways. In this case however it was very clear early on Dan was a scumbag. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't production ask Kellee if they wanted her to remove him or if she wanted to handle it herself? Then they did step in and talk about boundaries and to Dan specifically...and he STILL did something scummy, instant boot justified. I don't think you should immediately eject someone based on an accusation without some kind of investigation, however Survivor did have taped evidence. I'm torn, but I have to think that production did the best they could with what they knew. There is no possible way they thought it was a good idea to keep him on if everything they heard was true, there needed to be some due diligence. Plus I'm sure Dan is massively lawyer'd up and probably swung that leverage around as much as he possibly could. --- Do you like humor, gameplay, and daily content? Check out my hilarious let's play Youtube Channel, Tarvould's Quest! https://www.youtube.com/TarvouldsQuest</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1