no point at all? this is a clearly immoral act that you are "defending" for some reason.
(personally I enjoy a good philosophically interesting conversation. this is something I'm not decided on and would have naively sided with you when I first entered the thread; I may yet given the right argument.)
you guys are conflating the concept of considering an act to be immoral oneself, and for "society"/everyone-else considering an act to be immoral. obviously you don't care if everyone else thinks something is immoral if you don't agree. the question is, do you care if you think it's immoral?
I guess a conversation like this can only go on so long since we start to lose grasp of the flow of the conversation over time.
This all started from someone caring about a drug addict celebrities leaked pics... lmao