LogFAQs > #931138531

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Trump's misconduct a textbook case of impeachable offenses, experts say
karlpilkington4 12/05/19 10:31:57 AM #38:	Sackgurl posted... it is good that karl has shifted from trying to argue that sondland claimed trump didn't ask for a quid pro quo to attacking him, because attempting to argue the former would be a blatant lie dependent on nobody having actually seen or read his testimony which is more or less what i'd expect from someone who can't differentiate two ambassadors since he's just copypasting astroturf emails but it at least is using today's astroturf emails and not last week's I have not shifted anything. The ambassador claimed there was a quid pro quo. Then said the president never asked for a quid pro quo, and stated his only evidence for his claim was his own presumption. I can play the video for you, if you dont want to read it. --- Is This The Krusty Krab? "No This Is Patrick!" <cite>karlpilkington4 posted [p:931138531] in Trump's mi... [t:78227292]...</cite> <quote>Sackgurl posted... </cite> <quote>it is good that karl has shifted from trying to argue that sondland claimed trump didn't ask for a quid pro quo to attacking him, because attempting to argue the former would be a blatant lie dependent on nobody having actually seen or read his testimony which is more or less what i'd expect from someone who can't differentiate two ambassadors since he's just copypasting astroturf emails but it at least is using today's astroturf emails and not last week's</quote> I have not shifted anything. The ambassador claimed there was a quid pro quo. Then said the president never asked for a quid pro quo, and stated his only evidence for his claim was his own presumption. I can play the video for you, if you dont want to read it. --- Is This The Krusty Krab? "No This Is Patrick!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1