LogFAQs > #930727155

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 250: Hearing Laws
HeroDelTiempo17 11/26/19 12:16:42 PM #101:	Well this seems like it could be bad news in the future https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2019/11/26/20981758/brett-kavanaughs-terrify-democrats-supreme-court-gundy-paul the tldr is that the Supreme Court declined to take a case because it was too similar to a previous one, but Kavanaugh went out of his way to state that he agreed with the dissent in that previous case. The conservative justices there are basically arguing that Congress shouldn't be able to delegate broad power to federal agencies, and needs to be more specific. Which is bad, because some of those agencies are important, and a conservative, anti-regulatory SC would simply strike down more specific legislation it is opposed to. --- DPOblivion was far more determined than me. <cite>HeroDelTiempo17 posted [p:930727155] in Politics C... [t:78196160]...</cite> <quote>Well this seems like it could be bad news in the future https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2019/11/26/20981758/brett-kavanaughs-terrify-democrats-supreme-court-gundy-paul the tldr is that the Supreme Court declined to take a case because it was too similar to a previous one, but Kavanaugh went out of his way to state that he agreed with the dissent in that previous case. The conservative justices there are basically arguing that Congress shouldn't be able to delegate broad power to federal agencies, and needs to be more specific. Which is bad, because some of those agencies are important, and a conservative, anti-regulatory SC would simply strike down more specific legislation it is opposed to. --- DPOblivion was far more determined than me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1