LogFAQs > #930713326

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	~~SephG's decennial "Best of" topic: the 2010s!~~
Mr Lasastryke 11/26/19 3:02:58 AM #169:	Jakyl25 posted... Yeah Im looking at the Billboard top 200 albums of the decade list, and in the top 50 I only see 3 groups I would consider bands: 2 from Imagine Dragons, 2 from Mumford & Sons, and 1 from Lady Antebellum Even going down to the top 100, you only pick up Maroon 5, the Lumineers, and fun. which doesnt even exist anymore and aside from maroon 5, those bands haven't appeared in the top 40 for awhile. there's a handful of bands that still do pretty good album sales-wise (paramore also comes to mind) but the vast majority of them don't score hits anymore. --- Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta <cite>Mr Lasastryke posted [p:930713326] in ~~SephG's ... [t:78142245]...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah Im looking at the Billboard top 200 albums of the decade list, and in the top 50 I only see 3 groups I would consider bands: 2 from Imagine Dragons, 2 from Mumford & Sons, and 1 from Lady Antebellum Even going down to the top 100, you only pick up Maroon 5, the Lumineers, and fun. which doesnt even exist anymore</quote> and aside from maroon 5, those bands haven't appeared in the top 40 for awhile. there's a handful of bands that still do pretty good album sales-wise (paramore also comes to mind) but the vast majority of them don't score hits anymore. --- Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1