LogFAQs > #930707774

Balrog0 posted...

It's actually an example of how the administration and the legislature have changed the ACA overall to undermine the entire argument for why STI should be allowed by your own source. It is true if you try to isolate specific parts of what you shared you can minimize how meaningful that is.

My source was compiled and issued before Trump even took office. Published on 10/31/2016, and having been in review/discussion 2 months earlier, since June 10, 2016.

And feel free to post whatever sections you feel is relevant that I happened to omit, using the link I posted, to prove how STI were unavailable during the Obama administration.

I'll even use your own link; of the 2018 lawsuit attempting to stop expansions of STI offerings, meaning that the Trump administration used existing STI parameters as the foundation to create new guidelines off of (expanded date, etc.)