LogFAQs > #930706250

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topicinsurance rejects mans $35k bill due to pre-existing conditions
Loud_Pipes
11/25/19 10:54:25 PM
#50:


Balrog0 posted...
No, short term plans just used to apply to plans that were 3 months in duration, rather than competing directly with actual insurance by being literally one day shorter

Imagine wanting to carry water for trump so bad you'd just argue whatever industry talking point was popular. I at least respect libertarians that would just write this dude off entirely as an inefficient waste, that's a stance with principle even if it's deeply flawed morally


Calm the fuck down, I'm not married to any particular view. I'm just pointing out that you were wrong. Short term plans have never to my knowledge been affected by the pre-existing conditions law. I'm not saying that what happened here is good or should ever happen again.

And I'm gonna need a source that shows what you're talking about wrt short term plans that are just a day shorter than regular plans. The ones I've seen and purchased were for a handful of months, not for a year.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1