LogFAQs > #930353480

Lopen posted...

Someone who has remoted and non-remoted with a wide variety of competences, field overlaps, etc, would simply not be saying remote is always better as an absolute

This is so illogical. It's like anti-scientists saying that Newton and Einstein were disproved therefore all current science is false too. All my experience has shown it's a broadly good thing, and more experience only shows me solutions to difficulties, further solidifying my theories and arguments. Why would I not be adamant that it should be a goal for us to reach? If I get any decent counter evidence, THEN I'll change my mind. How could anything else make sense to a programmer?

turbopuns3 posted...

I can't fathom how someone could have a positive experience working closely on a team and then turn around and say communicating with humans face-to-face is the most awful method possible

Same with this. You guys are programmers, how is this even a question? I've made a ton of stuff I'm proud of using OOP, so now I can't recognize its horribleness? It makes no sense. You would never use this kind of logic to technical issues, but when it comes to "soft" skills, your standards totally drop. (And no, I don't need "more experience" just to go back to my college-tier thoughts on OOP.)
---

_foolmo_
2 + 2 = 4