LogFAQs > #930346685

I'm not anti-remote. I'm not sure when or why you started thinking I am.

In my first post, I said

turbopuns3 posted...

I mean I'm a software developer and when my team was given the option to try working from home, I still came to the office (though a couple people on my team stayed home) because I just work better in that environment for a number of reasons (human interaction being one). But my drive to work is 10-15 minutes so maybe it doesn't matter.

I work better.

I never said nobody could ever work better remote. I never said people shouldn't work remote.

I said I work better in the office, and you said that's like the worst possible way to communicate ever, and I responded to that. I don't think I ever argued that remote work cannot be effective.

foolm0r0n posted...

Nothing I presumed from you was a guess. It's all based on what you told me. You think less of your remote coworkers because they are lazy millennials. You can only handle hard problems face to face. These are things you have said yourself

I did not say any of that nor did I imply it. You just chose to extract the most convenient possible interpretation of things in order to push your point.

You said, with almost no context whatsoever,

foolm0r0n posted...

You are less effective than them.

You said this knowing nothing beyond the fact I do not work remote and they do work remote.

This assertion assumes a lot so you don't get to act like it doesn't.

Given no further context, you assumed the utmost optimism of my coworkers and the worst about me, ("They work from home and you do not, ergo they are more effective than you"), without even knowing them or me or anything about the organization of our workplace.

So, I'm sorry but you come across like a grossly self-important smug ass here. I never asked for your sources because I don't give a damn about your sources because they aren't going to change my situation whatsoever.