LogFAQs > #929876654

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicBritish couple told that they couldn't adopt white child because they're Indian
RebelElite791
11/09/19 1:11:34 AM
#43:


Tropicalwood posted...
ThyCorndog posted...
Tropicalwood posted...
I severely doubt they're actually indigenous, they were known for their military might for centuries as well as their overall influence. Seems more Arab all together aside from small portions.
but they are. the indian subcontinent is made up mostly of two macro ethnic groups, indo-aryans and dravidians (not counting the minorities beyond those two groups). dravidians are more native to south and south east asia than east asians are. south east asians are darker because they mixed with those groups when they moved down to southern asia from northern asia. dravidians are related to the pacific aboriginals like the australian natives. the other group, the indo-aryans, are related to iranic people. iranic people are also asian. there's nothing arab about india, and arabs are asian as well

Sorry, but Arabs are not Asians to the civilized world just because the EU doesn't want the Arabic world painted in a bad light when they're trying to mass import migrants from Syria or Pakistan. And don't act like the EU isn't pushing their same old refugee friendly narrative, we all know they're just trying to expand their own little wannabe United States.

Keep the white supremacist conspiracy theories to your backwater trash message boards please.
---
https://imgur.com/MS5SvzN
Take better care of your teeth and f***, a lot more.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1