LogFAQs > #929874159

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicBritish couple told that they couldn't adopt white child because they're Indian
ThyCorndog
11/08/19 11:30:09 PM
#39:


Tropicalwood posted...
I severely doubt they're actually indigenous, they were known for their military might for centuries as well as their overall influence. Seems more Arab all together aside from small portions.
but they are. the indian subcontinent is made up mostly of two macro ethnic groups, indo-aryans and dravidians (not counting the minorities beyond those two groups). dravidians are more native to south and south east asia than east asians are. south east asians are darker because they mixed with those groups when they moved down to southern asia from northern asia. dravidians are related to the pacific aboriginals like the australian natives. the other group, the indo-aryans, are related to iranic people. iranic people are also asian. there's nothing arab about india, and arabs are asian as well

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1