LogFAQs > #929834985

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	GF: We had to cut mons because it was too hard to model
JackMan 11/08/19 3:15:48 AM #130:	GavsEvans123 posted... As for returning Pokemon, why would Game Freak bring back, say, Zubat in Gen 9 when it missed out on Sword and Shield, and bringing back a Pokemon who didn't get snapped would take less work? Come Gen 10, it takes even more work to bring Zubat up to current standards and before you know it, Zubat never appears in a game again. I don't think that argument holds much water. GF already had all of Gen 1 good to go from Let's Go and still cut two thirds of them. If it was about which Pokemon take 'less work', more of them would have made it. --- Still the number one reason for the success of the Internet. Salutations, citizens! Jack Man here. https://www.youtube.com/user/JackManPlays <cite>JackMan posted [p:929834985] in GF: We had... [t:78142192]...</cite> <quote>GavsEvans123 posted...</cite> <quote>As for returning Pokemon, why would Game Freak bring back, say, Zubat in Gen 9 when it missed out on Sword and Shield, and bringing back a Pokemon who didn't get snapped would take less work? Come Gen 10, it takes even more work to bring Zubat up to current standards and before you know it, Zubat never appears in a game again.</quote> I don't think that argument holds much water. GF already had all of Gen 1 good to go from Let's Go and still cut two thirds of them. If it was about which Pokemon take 'less work', more of them would have made it. --- Still the number one reason for the success of the Internet. Salutations, citizens! Jack Man here. https://www.youtube.com/user/JackManPlays</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1