LogFAQs > #929809241

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicGF: We had to cut mons because it was too hard to model
Gatarix
11/07/19 3:25:29 PM
#83:


SaveEstelle posted...
These folks have clearly made their decision and hold firmly to the opinion that the number of Pokemon visible and catchable is not only the primary criteria for a new entrys quality but perhaps the only criteria.

Pokemon variety is honestly a huge criteria for me. I want different pokemon around every corner, not the equivalent of Rattatas and Zubats everywhere. That matters a lot more to me than giant pokemon or the postgame plot.

Granted, I'm not up in arms about the limited dex because it's not about the raw number of pokemon, it's about their in-game use. You could have a 400-pokemon game with a great spread, or a full pokedex game that severely underutilizes them. But yeah I don't think it's silly to think the number of pokemon visible and catchable is a big deal.
---
You put your RESOLVE HAT back on, which conveniently is the same hat as your NORMAL HAT.
{Drakeryn}
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1