LogFAQs > #929804443

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	GF: We had to cut mons because it was too hard to model
NBIceman 11/07/19 1:36:52 PM #24:	Zigzagoon posted... Again, I think people would be a lot less pissed if we were getting a game that was actually worth cutting 500 pokemon. I don't know if anyone here has been keeping up with spoilers... but ~~There's literally nothing new or exciting that these games are adding. Post game is a 2 hour little thing and then you have the battle tower. That's It.~~ Pokemon Stadium 1 and 2... games that were made on the N64 had like one thousand times the amount of personality put into it with the animations. Again. People would be a LOT less pissed if Sword and Shield had a ton of new interesting features along with great animations and graphics. Instead we get a slightly dialed up 3DS game that's removing more features than it's adding. And this is from the biggest media franchise in the world. But I guess we are all entitled. I guess WE should be the ones making the games if we have a problem with it. This is where I'm at too. I don't care about catching 'em all. Never have. But a lot of people have been waiting a long time for a mainline Pokemon game on a mainline console, because we assumed it would make for a really expansive adventure with interesting features that just weren't feasible on handhelds. And all of that grand potential has culminated in... giant Pokemon. If GameFreak was using all its development time on polish and presentation, it'd be one thing. But they're not. The graphics are mediocre and animations are absolutely horrendous. The excuses they've come up with are lazy at best and straight-up lies at worst. SwSh's existence doesn't offend me and if you want to buy it, more power to you. I hope you enjoy it. But there's a lot more to the complaints than just being entitled and spoiled. --- https://imgur.com/UYamul2 Spurs - Yankees - Eagles - Golden Knights <cite>NBIceman posted [p:929804443] in GF: We had... [t:78142192]...</cite> <quote>Zigzagoon posted...</cite> <quote>Again, I think people would be a lot less pissed if we were getting a game that was actually worth cutting 500 pokemon. I don't know if anyone here has been keeping up with spoilers... but There's literally nothing new or exciting that these games are adding. Post game is a 2 hour little thing and then you have the battle tower. That's It. Pokemon Stadium 1 and 2... games that were made on the N64 had like one thousand times the amount of personality put into it with the animations. Again. People would be a LOT less pissed if Sword and Shield had a ton of new interesting features along with great animations and graphics. Instead we get a slightly dialed up 3DS game that's removing more features than it's adding. And this is from the biggest media franchise in the world. But I guess we are all entitled. I guess WE should be the ones making the games if we have a problem with it.</quote> This is where I'm at too. I don't care about catching 'em all. Never have. But a lot of people have been waiting a long time for a mainline Pokemon game on a mainline console, because we assumed it would make for a really expansive adventure with interesting features that just weren't feasible on handhelds. And all of that grand potential has culminated in... giant Pokemon. If GameFreak was using all its development time on polish and presentation, it'd be one thing. But they're not. The graphics are mediocre and animations are absolutely horrendous. The excuses they've come up with are lazy at best and straight-up lies at worst. SwSh's existence doesn't offend me and if you want to buy it, more power to you. I hope you enjoy it. But there's a lot more to the complaints than just being entitled and spoiled. --- https://imgur.com/UYamul2 Spurs - Yankees - Eagles - Golden Knights</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1