LogFAQs > #929737042

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicStrong night for Democrats in off-year elections.
BlackScythe0
11/06/19 2:29:59 AM
#10:


streamofthesky posted...
BlackScythe0 posted...
streamofthesky posted...
BlackScythe0 posted...
The Virginia win is huge. It prevent republicans from being able to gerrymander the state with the census results. So don't underrate how big this victory is for the next decade.

The Kentucky win is basically meaningless for democrats nationally. Republicans won 5/6 races in Kentucky comfortably. Seems the governor who lost just really sucked, and he lost by a very thin margin. I don't think this is a sign that evil turtle is going to struggle next year.

Damn it

Him and Ted Cruz are fucking vile, way worse than Trump

Really depressing knowing we'll never get rid of them :(


Meh I keep seeing the news point to polls showing how unpopular he is, but they ignore that there is a big difference between a state election and a federal election. A democratic governor is going to operate under rather different politics than a democratic senator.

Governor and senator are both state-wide votes, not sure why one is so different from the other...
Of course, who's running matters, but Mitch is worse than dog shit, so if a decent Dem can beat an awful Repub for governor, not sure why the same can't happen for senator.
Or does Kentucky just intentionally send us their worst as a giant middle finger to the rest of the country?


I'm not talking about how they run. I'm talking about how they work while in office. A governor is just in the state. While the senator has to go work with the "coastal elites" that they HATE. I can't understand how much people around here hate "coastal elites".
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1