Topic List | Page List: 1 |
---|---|
Topic | Is Super Castlevania IV a remake of Castlevania 1? |
Epyo 10/31/19 5:04:44 PM #26: | My definition of "remake" is strict: It's a retelling of the same story. A specific moment, within that game universe's history, is being retold. By that definition, yes, it's a remake. It's literally the same moment in history (1700 something right?) in the castlevania game universe. (Disclaimer: it also can't be a "port" at all. If it's a port, that disqualifies it from being a remake. It needs entirely new art assets, there can't be some copied over or up-ressed.) ----- There are also situations where you can call a game "basically a remake". But I think you need the word "basically" in there. "Basically a remake" means a shocking number of similarities in gameplay, setting, characters, levels, world design, etc. But these are always very much a matter of opinion, and very arguable either way. I would say Link Between Worlds is "basically a remake" of Link to the Past. But the plot is so different that I wouldn't say it "is a remake" straight up. I mean, look at that new merge-with-walls mechanic. That ain't no remake. But it's "basically a remake". Sonic 2 I could see the argument that it's "basically a remake" of Sonic 1, but it's not great. Super Mario 3 I could totally see the argument that it's "basically a remake" of Super Mario 1. --- People who don't finish their sentences I'm a Castlevania superfan! Ask me anything! ... Copied to Clipboard! |
Topic List | Page List: 1 |