LogFAQs > #929171846

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Amber Guyger has immediately APPEALED her 10 year MURDER CONVICTION ALREADY!!!
LinkPizza 10/24/19 7:41:51 AM #37:	Aaantlion posted... wtf are you on about? The perp had no known relationship with the victim nor reason to visit that apartment. The investigators and the defense also proposed no alternative reason for her to be there. But go ahead, tell us why you don't believe she did it accidentally. I'll get some popcorn. I literally said I dont know. I just dont really believe it was. And while she says they didnt have any known relationship, we dont really know if they didnt, so... Rasmoh posted... So then you are restricting their rights. "You have to wait x amount of time to exercise your rights" is restrictive, by definition. So, youre not reading what I said? I said they could at any time. But doing sombefore a certain time can carry certain risk. Most things have a risk/reward system. This will just be me of them. I said they had to wait a certain amount of time before its penalty free. It they they could do it at anytime. Rasmoh posted... By justice system standards, it kind of has to be. Otherwise, you're restricting their rights. Nope. Lots of things are a case by case basis. It depends on all the circumstances surrounding the case. It doesnt have to be for all of them... Rasmoh posted... I'm all for saving time and money, but you're going to have to restrict rights to do so in the justice system. And again, not restricting rights... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:929171846] in Amber Guyg... [t:78106873]...</cite> <quote>Aaantlion posted...</cite> <quote>wtf are you on about? The perp had no known relationship with the victim nor reason to visit that apartment. The investigators and the defense also proposed no alternative reason for her to be there. But go ahead, tell us why you don't believe she did it accidentally. I'll get some popcorn.</quote> I literally said I dont know. I just dont really believe it was. And while she says they didnt have any known relationship, we dont really know if they didnt, so... Rasmoh posted...</cite> <quote>So then you are restricting their rights. "You have to wait x amount of time to exercise your rights" is restrictive, by definition.</quote> So, youre not reading what I said? I said they could at any time. But doing sombefore a certain time can carry certain risk. Most things have a risk/reward system. This will just be me of them. I said they had to wait a certain amount of time before its penalty free. It they they could do it at anytime. Rasmoh posted...</cite> <quote>By justice system standards, it kind of has to be. Otherwise, you're restricting their rights.</quote> Nope. Lots of things are a case by case basis. It depends on all the circumstances surrounding the case. It doesnt have to be for all of them... Rasmoh posted...</cite> <quote>I'm all for saving time and money, but you're going to have to restrict rights to do so in the justice system.</quote> And again, not restricting rights... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1