LogFAQs > #928959144

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Can it be considered a Sloppy Joe without the bun?
StealThisSheen 10/19/19 3:48:37 AM #200:	VintageGin posted... My family has always referred to them as sloppy joes, and it's always specifically been in reference to the meat/stuff you put in the sandwich. But you seem to have just instinctively referred to "sloppy joes" as "them," which is plural, which you can't really refer to the meat/sauce that way. Like, you'd never say "Yeah, I have a pot of them" referring to a pot of soup. You would say "Yeah, I have a bunch of them" referring to sandwiches. I'm gonna count this as a half point for our side thank you sir for your contribution --- Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996 Step FOUR! Get Paid! <cite>StealThisSheen posted [p:928959144] in Can it be ... [t:78090486]...</cite> <quote>VintageGin posted...</cite> <quote>My family has always referred to them as sloppy joes, and it's always specifically been in reference to the meat/stuff you put in the sandwich.</quote> But you seem to have just instinctively referred to "sloppy joes" as "them," which is plural, which you can't really refer to the meat/sauce that way. Like, you'd never say "Yeah, I have a pot of them" referring to a pot of soup. You would say "Yeah, I have a bunch of them" referring to sandwiches. I'm gonna count this as a half point for our side thank you sir for your contribution --- Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996 Step FOUR! Get Paid!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1