LogFAQs > #928899811

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Can it be considered a Sloppy Joe without the bun?
HeroDelTiempo17 10/17/19 6:26:51 PM #148:	LeonhartFour posted... Well, the Reuben is a Reuben because it's served on rye bread, too, so that's an essential part of what makes it a Reuben. Would you consider it a Reuben if you put it on a hamburger bun? Yes, but it's non-traditional, and you should make that distinction. And also, you are retaining the traditional structure, at least. It's totally fine to take a sandwich and put it in a salad, bowl, or wrap, but you have to specify. If you take the ingredients on their own (the pile of reuben) without putting then in anything, usually it's called a "deconstructed" sandwich, and those are stupid. I'd argue you're eating deconstructed sloppy joes. --- DPOblivion was far more determined than me. <cite>HeroDelTiempo17 posted [p:928899811] in Can it be ... [t:78090486]...</cite> <quote>LeonhartFour posted... </cite> <quote>Well, the Reuben is a Reuben because it's served on rye bread, too, so that's an essential part of what makes it a Reuben. Would you consider it a Reuben if you put it on a hamburger bun?</quote> Yes, but it's non-traditional, and you should make that distinction. And also, you are retaining the traditional structure, at least. It's totally fine to take a sandwich and put it in a salad, bowl, or wrap, but you have to specify. If you take the ingredients on their own (the pile of reuben) without putting then in anything, usually it's called a "deconstructed" sandwich, and those are stupid. I'd argue you're eating deconstructed sloppy joes. --- DPOblivion was far more determined than me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1