| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Can it be considered a Sloppy Joe without the bun? |
| Llarian 10/17/19 3:55:44 PM #116: | Much like sappy occasion cards and human beings, it's what's on the inside that counts. I'm of the opinion that we need to have universal terminology that applies, no matter how the person chooses to dine. When serving myself, I have filled the hamburger bun with 1/3 of the meat typically served. Is it then a Tidy Joseph? No, it's still a sloppy joe. The sauce, meat, etc. all tastes distinctly like a sloppy joe. I come from the midwest, so I'm not familiar with coneys. Internet results are returning 'sloppy hot dog'. This article from 1992 does confirm that "On close inspection of the recipe, some will recognize the ingredients of the sloppy Joe." https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1992-10-01-9203290499-story.html Most people aren't going to tack on 'meat' or 'sandwich' - the lack of distinction in usage means that OP is in fact eating a sloppy joe. --- Let's not forget we are so strong, so bloody strong ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |