LogFAQs > #928662313

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I'm so impressed with God of War (PS4) [SPOILERS]
UnfairRepresent 10/12/19 3:15:24 AM #51:	Banjo2553 posted... It's slow-paced if you want it to be. I like how 1. those were edited videos. 2 they were still slower than the previous games 3. they were still less effective than ice blast and wolves says it all really SwayM posted... My favourite part is he says the game is one of the safest games out there and took zero risks and then goes on to say Clearly just has a vendetta out for the game but that just makes me laugh. No risks taken, evidently can miraculously take a big fat steamer all over the lore...in the safest, zero risk way possible. wut.. The game disregarding lore is a vendetta? and how is ignoring lore and gameplay design to make it super safe, super popular and super mainstream a risk? Personally I think it says a lot that you didn't actually reply to any point I made. You just insulted me. What do you think risk means? To me it means personal or artistic choices that mean there is a decent chance of crippling the games sales or popularity Sequel hooking, toning down the violence/sex, being more childish, bringing a child to protect, focus on graphics over substance, making it super easy etc These are all safe choices MGS2 replacing Snake with Raiden was a risk This War of mine was a risk SHENMUE was a risk Again theres nothing inherently good or bad about being safe vs taking risks other than artistic integrity, but why lie about it? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! https://imgtc.com/i/bHqCLJF.png https://i.imgtc.com/YnvkpvU.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:928662313] in I'm so... [t:78079356]...</cite> <quote>Banjo2553 posted...</cite> <quote>It's slow-paced if you want it to be.</quote> I like how 1. those were edited videos. 2 they were still slower than the previous games 3. they were still less effective than ice blast and wolves says it all really SwayM posted...</cite> <quote>My favourite part is he says the game is one of the safest games out there and took zero risks and then goes on to say Clearly just has a vendetta out for the game but that just makes me laugh. No risks taken, evidently can miraculously take a big fat steamer all over the lore...in the safest, zero risk way possible. </quote> wut.. The game disregarding lore is a vendetta? and how is ignoring lore and gameplay design to make it super safe, super popular and super mainstream a risk? Personally I think it says a lot that you didn't actually reply to any point I made. You just insulted me. What do you think risk means? To me it means personal or artistic choices that mean there is a decent chance of crippling the games sales or popularity Sequel hooking, toning down the violence/sex, being more childish, bringing a child to protect, focus on graphics over substance, making it super easy etc These are all safe choices MGS2 replacing Snake with Raiden was a risk This War of mine was a risk SHENMUE was a risk Again theres nothing inherently good or bad about being safe vs taking risks other than artistic integrity, but why lie about it? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! https://imgtc.com/i/bHqCLJF.png https://i.imgtc.com/YnvkpvU.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1