LogFAQs > #928103221

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	College Football (NCAA) Discussion Topic
Jakyl25 09/29/19 1:52:27 PM #107:	Corrik7 posted... BlueCrystalTear posted... It'd be a limit of two teams per conference, to allow for more geographic regions to be represented and to prevent there from being too many rematches. So UCF could have and would have been the 6-seed last year. I think it should be 5 power champs, highest non power 5 conference guaranteed, and 2 at larges from any conference. I think they should use the old BCS computers to determine at larges/highest ranked non power 5 and not people. I actually agree with you 100% on something! If ND wants to flex their muscle, fine, give them an automatic at-large bid if they finish Top 8 --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:928103221] in College Fo... [t:77961175]...</cite> <quote>Corrik7 posted...</cite> <quote>BlueCrystalTear posted... </cite> <quote>It'd be a limit of two teams per conference, to allow for more geographic regions to be represented and to prevent there from being too many rematches. So UCF could have and would have been the 6-seed last year.</quote>I think it should be 5 power champs, highest non power 5 conference guaranteed, and 2 at larges from any conference. I think they should use the old BCS computers to determine at larges/highest ranked non power 5 and not people. </quote> I actually agree with you 100% on something! If ND wants to flex their muscle, fine, give them an automatic at-large bid if they finish Top 8 --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1