LogFAQs > #926774180

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Two NY ex-policemen walk free after raping handcuffed suspect
karlpilkington4 08/31/19 9:21:17 AM #152:	Shablagoo posted... Yeah, they werent charged with rape because of a loophole, which the District Attorney regrets (I feel like Im repeating myself...): Martins and Hall, who resigned from the New York police department in 2017, "engaged in a shocking abuse of power", said Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez, adding that he "would have preferred to see them serve prison time". "We could not apply the new law retroactively, and serious credibility issues in this case precluded us from proceeding on additional charges," said Mr Gonzalez, "yet we remained committed to holding these defendants accountable". You're repeating yourself because you don't even understand the argument. The technicality you keep repeating is what the guy was asking about in the first place. He asked a legitimate question, you attacked him. That's the only thing that matters. No one is impressed that you think you understand a case better than the people who were actually involved (Judge, DA, etc) --- Is This The Krusty Krab? "No This Is Patrick!" <cite>karlpilkington4 posted [p:926774180] in Two NY ex-... [t:77975549]...</cite> <quote>Shablagoo posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah, they werent charged with rape because of a loophole, which the District Attorney regrets (I feel like Im repeating myself...): Martins and Hall, who resigned from the New York police department in 2017, "engaged in a shocking abuse of power", said Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez, adding that he "would have preferred to see them serve prison time". "We could not apply the new law retroactively, and serious credibility issues in this case precluded us from proceeding on additional charges," said Mr Gonzalez, "yet we remained committed to holding these defendants accountable".</quote> You're repeating yourself because you don't even understand the argument. The technicality you keep repeating is what the guy was asking about in the first place. He asked a legitimate question, you attacked him. That's the only thing that matters. No one is impressed that you think you understand a case better than the people who were actually involved (Judge, DA, etc) --- Is This The Krusty Krab? "No This Is Patrick!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1