LogFAQs > #926373237

I kind of like the 2/2/1 idea myself. We had 3/2/1 last year with 14 and I thought that was fun (like you I like bigger leagues where you really have to find some good hidden players somewhere).

With 16 I do agree with Reg that 3/2/1 is probably unreasonable, but I think 1/2/1 might be too far in the other direction.

This will be a difficult one to vote on though, so I'd probably first have us vote "should roster size be changed" and if people like that then "which option is best (or rank as many as we have suggested)".

I'll also try to @ people tonight to make sure they see this.
---

Moops?
"I thought you were making up diseases? That's spontaneous dental hydroplosion."