| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Do you guys think using "implications" to get sex is rape? |
| LinkPizza 07/21/19 12:00:58 AM #142: | lihlih posted... See? You're ignoring bigass statistical data because it doesn't match your anecdotal data, which is nonsensical and is telling of how limited your knowledge of statistics is. Once your get a big enough pool of data, some outliers like people not reporting doesn't matter, because of the law of averages. Also, if not every woman reports their sexual attacks, that supports the idea that women are even more at risk that the status show, not the opposite. I even said that myself. I said that a bunch of women also dont report. But I dont see how the data pool is that big when so many people from both genders dont report. Thats why I have trouble believing the data is accurate. People keep saying the data pool is big, but its hard to for me to believe that given that so much data is not reported. And as I said, having low faith in one statistic doesnt mean I know nothing about statistic. It just means I have low faith in it. It doesnt mean I know nothing of the whole subject. It just means I have low faith in one part of the subject. Youre acting like I have to believe every single statistic with 100% to know anything about the subject at all. And I think a person who just blindly believes in statistics 100% is actually the one who doesnt know anything about them... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |