LogFAQs > #924953128

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Do you guys think using "implications" to get sex is rape?
LinkPizza 07/20/19 5:25:52 PM #132:	Lirishae posted... LinkPizza posted... Thats why its hard to believe in these statistics. I have a strong feeling the real issue here is you don't want to believe the statistics. Either way, you don't seem to understand how they work. It's impossible to successfully query every single relevant person to form a 100% accurate conclusion. Instead, you conduct a scientific survey to create a sufficient sample size, and use this data to draw as accurate conclusions as possible. This article explains more about how it works. https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-statistics-3126367 Unless you can provide a tangible critique of why the methodology behind current statistics is flawed, I'm going to choose to believe them over a random internet stranger's personal opinion. It has nothing with not wanting to believe the stats. I even said I think more women are probably victims of sexual assault. I just dont think we know enough to say how many more than women. And I also said in another post that its hard for most studies to get 100% accuracy. But I said its seems like it would be much harder for this type of crime that seems to go unreported more. We know there are a lot of people that dont report it. And you can see many people even this day coming out to report stuff that happened long ago. And thats probably not all of them. And there are men, too. And less men have come forward. But that could be for many reasons. Maybe its because there are less. I believe there are less. Or maybe its be cause of the time they grew up in, or not wanting to get certain people in trouble, or not wanting to look bad in front of others. Usually other studies have more accurate reports. If youre talking about only reported things, thats different. But also changes this whole topic. And honestly, you dont have to believe me. Ive said it before to others, and Ill say it again to you. Just like you said, were just random internet strangers. What you say doesnt matter much to me, either... Maybe Ill believe more of their statistics when theres more to go on rather than just educated guesses made with not enough information... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:924953128] in Do you guy... [t:77871100]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lirishae posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>Thats why its hard to believe in these statistics.</quote> I have a strong feeling the real issue here is you don't want to believe the statistics. Either way, you don't seem to understand how they work. It's impossible to successfully query every single relevant person to form a 100% accurate conclusion. Instead, you conduct a scientific survey to create a sufficient sample size, and use this data to draw as accurate conclusions as possible. This article explains more about how it works. https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-statistics-3126367 Unless you can provide a tangible critique of why the methodology behind current statistics is flawed, I'm going to choose to believe them over a random internet stranger's personal opinion.</quote> It has nothing with not wanting to believe the stats. I even said I think more women are probably victims of sexual assault. I just dont think we know enough to say how many more than women. And I also said in another post that its hard for most studies to get 100% accuracy. But I said its seems like it would be much harder for this type of crime that seems to go unreported more. We know there are a lot of people that dont report it. And you can see many people even this day coming out to report stuff that happened long ago. And thats probably not all of them. And there are men, too. And less men have come forward. But that could be for many reasons. Maybe its because there are less. I believe there are less. Or maybe its be cause of the time they grew up in, or not wanting to get certain people in trouble, or not wanting to look bad in front of others. Usually other studies have more accurate reports. If youre talking about only reported things, thats different. But also changes this whole topic. And honestly, you dont have to believe me. Ive said it before to others, and Ill say it again to you. Just like you said, were just random internet strangers. What you say doesnt matter much to me, either... Maybe Ill believe more of their statistics when theres more to go on rather than just educated guesses made with not enough information... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1