LogFAQs > #924861188

Lirishae posted...

Bugmeat posted...

In the scenario being referenced there is no actual threat. Just a situation and a setting created to induce the woman to make the threats in her own mind. To push her imagination in that direction so despite no threat ever being made she feels like if she doesn't something bad may happen. But that's all in her head. That's where she took it.

Its skeevy as f*** but since the threats are all imagined it isn't rape.

So if a mobster creates a situation with the specific intent of making you feel intimidated, it's your fault for feeling threatened, he did nothing wrong, and surrendering your valuables wasn't theft.

But if the situation is to mirror what Dennis describes in Always Sunny, then the mobster has done nothing to even show he is a mobster and has done absolutely nothing that is threatening. But you willingly went to a location with him and then became paranoid about the guy, despite him doing nothing threatening.

Honestly, the whole implications thing sorta reminds a bit like the Trayvon Martin situation (to me at least). He was shot because of implications. But was it Trayvons fault in the slightest? No. George Zimmerman acted on implications he created in his own head.
---

Live action Hungry Hungry Hippos though, now that was a sport. ~Aeon Azuran