LogFAQs > #924643548

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	First Fire Emblem: Three Houses review
Panthera 07/13/19 5:50:49 PM #74:	LapisLazuli posted... If they hadn't done this the series would be LITERALLY dead instead of your nebulous figuratively dead. FE was going to get shelved Advance Wars style if Awakening didn't blow up. It's pretty hard to buy into that when the sales figure that Awakening supposedly had to meet to "save the series" was one met by almost every other game in the series prior. Not to mention Awakening sold well because it was marketed and released at a non-stupid time, whereas most previous games had minimal/shitty marketing and a lot of had awful release dates late in consoles lifespans or at the same time as a bigger game --- Meow! <cite>Panthera posted [p:924643548] in First Fire... [t:77856187]...</cite> <quote><cite>LapisLazuli posted...</cite> <quote>If they hadn't done this the series would be LITERALLY dead instead of your nebulous figuratively dead. FE was going to get shelved Advance Wars style if Awakening didn't blow up.</quote> It's pretty hard to buy into that when the sales figure that Awakening supposedly had to meet to "save the series" was one met by almost every other game in the series prior. Not to mention Awakening sold well because it was marketed and released at a non-stupid time, whereas most previous games had minimal/shitty marketing and a lot of had awful release dates late in consoles lifespans or at the same time as a bigger game --- Meow!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1