LogFAQs > #923849544

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 227: Cancel the Politics Topic: 250 B8ers will Die
red sox 777
06/25/19 10:01:20 PM
#131:


Xp please don't accuse me of not reading things when you have no idea what you are talking about.

I did read the article, and other ones. Can't copy/paste url on phone but please go to the front page of Scotusblog for a much more fair and not misleading article.

The party opposing the government brought the new facts in the other case to the Supreme Court's attention. The government responded. If SCOTUS decides this case on legal reasoning that applies to the other one, obviously the other case gets resolved. If the other case has different facts such that the same legal reasoning is not applicable it wouldn't get resolved!

There is no way SCOTUS is going to decide a case not before it with different facts. To suggest they would do that based on partisanship is sensationalist garbage.
---
September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013
Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1