Alright, if you wanna get semantical, let's get semantical. If that's not a word, it is now. Let's look at the sentence that prompted your baww session: "in the western world, homosexuality is not just completely accepted, it's favored." The first part is simple, I'd assume, so I won't cover it. Now, the completely accepted bit? You put words in his mouth. What he said, on post number 455, is as such: "It's not just accepted, it's favored" He never said completely accepted, he said accepted. I won't deny that there are people who are against gays, but he's saying that the general consensus is acceptance, not rejection. As in, the majority believe nothing is wrong with homosexuality. I know this song and dance is played out, but that is, by definition, a strawman. Sorry to invalidate your argument, but, well, it was never such to begin with.
Uh, I know I should know better than to grant you a response, but wtf is this?
I mean, you even quote the post, so it's not like you missed the second clause of Smuffin's statement. But what part of "favored" is confusing to you when interpreting his post? ---