Anyways, you're right that I'm going about this in a disingenuously ingenious way... the point I'm trying to raise is that if someone is against abortions, they must by necessity be charged with the long term care of an unwanted child... whether this be via an increase in taxes to support foster care or whatever
Why should they? If other people are going to step up and care for the baby -- people who really want a child, often so badly that they need to pay a surrogate -- why would you cruelly shove the baby into a government-run center? And if you're making absurd points, why stop there? Why not force people in favor of Section-8 to give up their homes? And if you're not in favor of Section-8, then by that logic you should be forced to personally execute anybody who can't find a home, right? Let's keep that utterly disingenuous, bad faith argument ball rolling!
I don't have an answer for those questions, but they are in line with the spirit of the topic - so, why not?
Why not execute those who are unable of contributing? And the answer is simple, cost. It's cheaper to let people die than to do it yourself.
So now we have baby coffin cribs and section 8 coffin beds. ---