LogFAQs > #920753494

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Survivor Discussion Topic 2: At the Edge of Extinction
Inviso 04/19/19 4:01:58 PM #234:	Inviso posted... Underleveled posted... Inviso posted... Eric & Jeremy Rachel & Dave Meghan & Cheyne Justin & Diana Dave & Connor (24) Art & JJ So yeah, them going out in leg 1 is unexpectedly awesome. Kinda surprised Nick and Starr arent on there. They had a lot of 1st places IIRC. They're up there, but they had two legs early on around 7th/8th. I think the TOP top tier can only afford one low placement maximum. Okay, looking at the season, it seems like not only did Nick & Starr have a string of 6/6/5 placements...but the season only had eleven legs, so not only did they have multiple sub-third placements, but there were fewer legs than a lot of seasons to dilute the average. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:920753494] in Survivor D... [t:77612568]...</cite> <quote><cite>Inviso posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Underleveled posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Inviso posted...</cite> <quote>Eric & Jeremy Rachel & Dave Meghan & Cheyne Justin & Diana Dave & Connor (24) Art & JJ So yeah, them going out in leg 1 is unexpectedly awesome.</quote> Kinda surprised Nick and Starr arent on there. They had a lot of 1st places IIRC.</quote> They're up there, but they had two legs early on around 7th/8th. I think the TOP top tier can only afford one low placement maximum.</quote> Okay, looking at the season, it seems like not only did Nick & Starr have a string of 6/6/5 placements...but the season only had eleven legs, so not only did they have multiple sub-third placements, but there were fewer legs than a lot of seasons to dilute the average. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1