LogFAQs > #914931523

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Have tattoos lost their edge? Or is it not about edge anymore?
knutjob 12/30/18 3:14:39 PM #10:	RoboLaserGandhi posted... Tattoos are now just "this is my favorite pop culture thing! I'm gonna draw it on myself, but permanently!" Few people ever get actually aesthetically pleasing tattoos. They should be decorations for your body; works of art that give your body some visual style. Not the equivalent of a children's sticker. That's why I never understood the hate for tribal tattoos. They don't represent any sort of dumb "message" or affinity for a brand, they're just cool to look at. Agreed with you until the tribal point. They were crap, boring and pop culture sticker tattoos for people who didn't know what tattoo to get but got one anyway. <cite>knutjob posted [p:914931523] in Have tatto... [t:77346654]...</cite> <quote><cite>RoboLaserGandhi posted...</cite> <quote>Tattoos are now just "this is my favorite pop culture thing! I'm gonna draw it on myself, but permanently!" Few people ever get actually aesthetically pleasing tattoos. They should be decorations for your body; works of art that give your body some visual style. Not the equivalent of a children's sticker. That's why I never understood the hate for tribal tattoos. They don't represent any sort of dumb "message" or affinity for a brand, they're just cool to look at.</quote> Agreed with you until the tribal point. They were crap, boring and pop culture sticker tattoos for people who didn't know what tattoo to get but got one anyway.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1