LogFAQs > #914896642

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I was dumb enough to think Notre Dame actually had a chance this game.
Corrik 12/29/18 9:00:27 PM #32:	eaedwards6400 posted... Corrik posted... eaedwards6400 posted... I don't think Love allows WR to get as open the way the backup did. Julian Love is much better one v one than his back is. Not too mention that was a circus catch to begin with. The guy who that was scored one was Loves backup. The WR wasn't open. It was perfectly covered and the WR made an amazing catch. So if you're saying they always get that TD then with Love it is 17-3. Still not a win but a better game. I'd venture to say if not running out the clock with a lot of backups in the 4th quarter that they could have scored 2 more TDS that quarter easily. They were gashing with the run at that point. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:914896642] in I was dumb... [t:77344243]...</cite> <quote><cite>eaedwards6400 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>eaedwards6400 posted...</cite> <quote> I don't think Love allows WR to get as open the way the backup did. Julian Love is much better one v one than his back is. Not too mention that was a circus catch to begin with. The guy who that was scored one was Loves backup.</quote> The WR wasn't open. It was perfectly covered and the WR made an amazing catch.</quote> So if you're saying they always get that TD then with Love it is 17-3. Still not a win but a better game.</quote> I'd venture to say if not running out the clock with a lot of backups in the 4th quarter that they could have scored 2 more TDS that quarter easily. They were gashing with the run at that point. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1