LogFAQs > #914895160

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicI was dumb enough to think Notre Dame actually had a chance this game.
Corrik
12/29/18 8:25:59 PM
#25:


eaedwards6400 posted...
Corrik posted...
eaedwards6400 posted...
I'm not going to pretend that was a close game but listen to this argument. During 3/4 Clemson touchdowns occured while NDs best defensive back was not on the field. With Julian Love out Notre Dame is unable to rusher the passer because now Drue Tranquil now has to help Loves backup. This gives Trevor Lawrence more time and thus gives his guys more time to get open. All of Clemson's touchdowns were 20+ yards. Only one occured while Julian Love was on the field (and that was a run play).

This is the dumbest thing I have heard to justify the loss.


With Julian Love in the game the Irish only gave up 10 points. I'm not saying they would have won the game but I am saying that the game would have been much much closer and naturally would have required the Notre Dame offense to move the ball more. While it is a justification it is just reading the stats.

Dude, how does that player stop the end of half td. There was no help on the play and it was thrown immediately.
---
LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1