LogFAQs > #914581267

PrivateBiscuit1 posted...

All I'm going to say is that there is absolutely no reason why any fan of anything should have to suffer through something as awful as those 3-on-3-on-3 storylines that went on for months and be expected to wait and see.

It's about the language that is used.

It's 100% fair to deem the 3-on-3-on-3 segments garbage without declaring the entire women's revolution a disaster when it's nowhere close to being done. Those are two separate things.

Likewise declaring Almas a failure in WWE is wrong at this moment in time. He is currently failing. He has not yet failed.

And to me that second one isn't even about positivity or negativity. I don't really care about Almas and whether he succeeds or fails. But I certainly wouldn't say he's failed on the main roster just yet. If WWE ended right now, his career thus far on the main roster would have been a failure, but that isn't going to happen. To me, in Almas' case he hasn't truly failed until he's released or dropped down to NXT having made no impact.

So yeah to me it's more about extreme language and sweeping statements. Moderate and don't go too far in the criticism.
---

Not to be confused with XIII_Stones.
Advokaiser won the guru contest, nice job!