Sure, we can go with your equivalent. It still makes my point.
What is your point? That overt discrimination against Muslims is less tolerated than overt discrimination against Christians? I agree with that personally, but it's also meaningful that you can't think of an actual analogy here because that's what sets the tone of the responses.
The fact that Islam is a minority religion that largely just gets dumped on in minute and everyday ways has real world implications for how people respond to you dumping on the religion.
For instance, one thing you see a lot more of for Muslims than Christians is that people get mad and protest them for wanting to open up a house of worship. You see a lot of states passing laws trying to outlaw 'muslim courts.'
It is the same way that you can shit on white people on twitter and no one cares but if you call black people names you get censored. But at the same time being black is worse than being white in many ways due to other forms of covert and overt discrimination in the institutions that govern our laws. So would you act like it's better to be black because you can say that white people can't cook or w/e on twitter?
So idk what I'm supposed to take away from this conversation.
it's quite simple. These sorts of people argue that inequality on things that actually matter (criminal justice, economics, politics etc.) are just things that are made to be accepted and navigated through, while at the same time, demanding equality be enforced socially. Its maddening ---
If you're not voting like a black woman, your opinion doesn't matter to me