LogFAQs > #914052659

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Apparently Kingdom Hearts core fans hates new players to the series.
codey 12/13/18 10:19:02 AM #90:	AdviceMan posted... codey posted... I'm kind of with the guy that called all the handheld games spin offs. The big issue is that they're calling the new one #3, when there's been like 4 or 5 (I really don't know) games between 2 and 3. If you number a series 1-2-3, I should be able to play 1-2-3 and get all the story info in a way that's complete and makes sense. All of the other games should only enhance that main story. They shouldn't have plot info that's absolutely vital, especially if they're all on a different random handheld system that's hard to get a hold of. They aren't spin-offs because they hold absolutely vital information. Your argument that they are not aptly named holds merit, however, that is irrelevant to the fact that they are not spinoffs. Yeah, I guess what I'm saying is that they SHOULD be spinoffs, and in any other series they WOULD be (except MGS, which caused me to be lost in V). Sure, they put the vital bitsnin the rereleases, but if I played 1 and 2 over a decade ago I should be able to play 3 without missing any vital info. Basically, they're named like spinoffs, put on different handhelds like spinoffs, have different gameplay like spinoffs, but the story isn't treated like spinoffs. They way they're handled absolutely makes them look like spinoffs to newcomers of the series. --- *runs out of topic naked* <cite>codey posted [p:914052659] in Apparently... [t:77291902]...</cite> <quote><cite>AdviceMan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>codey posted...</cite> <quote>I'm kind of with the guy that called all the handheld games spin offs. The big issue is that they're calling the new one #3, when there's been like 4 or 5 (I really don't know) games between 2 and 3. If you number a series 1-2-3, I should be able to play 1-2-3 and get all the story info in a way that's complete and makes sense. All of the other games should only enhance that main story. They shouldn't have plot info that's absolutely vital, especially if they're all on a different random handheld system that's hard to get a hold of.</quote> They aren't spin-offs because they hold absolutely vital information. Your argument that they are not aptly named holds merit, however, that is irrelevant to the fact that they are not spinoffs.</quote> Yeah, I guess what I'm saying is that they SHOULD be spinoffs, and in any other series they WOULD be (except MGS, which caused me to be lost in V). Sure, they put the vital bitsnin the rereleases, but if I played 1 and 2 over a decade ago I should be able to play 3 without missing any vital info. Basically, they're named like spinoffs, put on different handhelds like spinoffs, have different gameplay like spinoffs, but the story isn't treated like spinoffs. They way they're handled absolutely makes them look like spinoffs to newcomers of the series. --- runs out of topic naked </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1