LogFAQs > #913699862

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	What particular statements by Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson make them alt righ
scar the 1 12/07/18 5:16:40 AM #65:	Grischnak posted... scar the 1 posted... I didn't really go into how correct he actually was in his explanation, but shockingly it actually turns out he wasn't. His line of reasoning relied on some simplifications of the facts of the matter, so not only was he doing the same apologia that the Nazis were doing at the time, he was also relying on a such oversimplified description of how things were that it doesn't really hold up to scrutiny This has already been pointed out on CE before. Again, he knew exactly what he was saying, he knew it was false, and he knew who he was talking to. Do you really think Nazis are a huge section of the H3H3 audience? That's the clip we're talking about right? As for him being factually wrong, about what? The disgust thing? I don't know much about that. Maybe it is wrong? But his overall point about post-WW1 Germany being a hellhole and that situation leading the rise of the Nazi party is accurate. I don't see how anyone can even try to refute that. I think that alt-right/neo-Nazis are a significant section of his audience, and I think his audience will seek out and share clips with him. About his factual inaccuracies, like I said, this was already discussed on CE in the topic "Jordan Peterson: Nazi apologist". Particularly, Firewerx made an informative post about post-WW1 Germany being a hellhole and Hitler capitalizing on it. Dash_Harber also elaborates a bit. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:913699862] in What parti... [t:77271679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Grischnak posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>I didn't really go into how correct he actually was in his explanation, but shockingly it actually turns out he wasn't. His line of reasoning relied on some simplifications of the facts of the matter, so not only was he doing the same apologia that the Nazis were doing at the time, he was also relying on a such oversimplified description of how things were that it doesn't really hold up to scrutiny This has already been pointed out on CE before. Again, he knew exactly what he was saying, he knew it was false, and he knew who he was talking to.</quote> Do you really think Nazis are a huge section of the H3H3 audience? That's the clip we're talking about right? As for him being factually wrong, about what? The disgust thing? I don't know much about that. Maybe it is wrong? But his overall point about post-WW1 Germany being a hellhole and that situation leading the rise of the Nazi party is accurate. I don't see how anyone can even try to refute that.</quote> I think that alt-right/neo-Nazis are a significant section of his audience, and I think his audience will seek out and share clips with him. About his factual inaccuracies, like I said, this was already discussed on CE in the topic "Jordan Peterson: Nazi apologist". Particularly, Firewerx made an informative post about post-WW1 Germany being a hellhole and Hitler capitalizing on it. Dash_Harber also elaborates a bit. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1