Topic List | Page List: 1 |
---|---|
Topic | Contest Stats and Discussion - Part 1316 |
creativename 12/04/18 10:17:42 PM #221: | LusterSoldier posted... creativename posted...But dont the results so far indicate the registered users are more hardcore Nintendo fans? The registereds being bigger Nintendo fans and favoring Mario is exactly in line with why Mario rSFFs though. Lopen posted... I am happy to move on I just don't like people saying calling Mario > Samus by a lot was luck that depended upon Mario boosting when we literally just had a match that proved rSFF exists. Are you strawmanning? At what point did I say Mario wouldnt rSFF her pre 2K5? Even before the rematch I thought I made it clear Id expect him to have rSFFed her back then. The argument was about magnitude. I have made my claims explicit repeatedly. That Mario in 2K4 would not break 55%. I was firm on this even before the rematch. And that one can no longer with credibility say Mario beating Samus is a 100% lock, which I am only saying after this result. I think these should be completely non-controversial claims. I believe these are extremely weak claims. I simply cannot see how these should be controversial claims. Predicting Mario to win with 60% was *partially* luck if your reasoning had nothing to do with Mario rising substantially in relative strength to Samus. Not even a question. I am obviously not saying picking Mario to win via rSFF was luck. So do you think if Mario got 60% here, that would have somehow helped *my* position? Obviously not. The better Samus did here, the more one can say SFF is wonky. The way you are looking at this match is just bizarre. At any rate, I think both of us and everybody else would be better off if we let this irritating discussion die. This is a waste of time for all involved. ... Copied to Clipboard! |
Topic List | Page List: 1 |