LogFAQs > #912478394

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Transgender MMA Fighter Breaks Female Opponent's Skull
Dragonblade01 11/15/18 8:39:59 PM #287:	midgar posted... Dragonblade01 posted... Why not? Just because something is most common or default doesn't mean it can't have a separate label to distinguish it from less common varieties. I think the question is more why, not why not. Also, less common is probably a bit generous, given the rarity. I'm not sure why the default requires additional steps to identify itself. It's not the variation, it's the standard. It's not that we always need to use cisgender. It exists for when it's important to distinguish. You don't go around referring to people as heterosexuals, but the term exists when it's relevant. You don't refer to milk as "whole milk" in normal conversation, but the distinction is used as necessary. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:912478394] in Transgende... [t:77203442]...</cite> <quote><cite>midgar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote> Why not? Just because something is most common or default doesn't mean it can't have a separate label to distinguish it from less common varieties.</quote> I think the question is more why, not why not. Also, less common is probably a bit generous, given the rarity. I'm not sure why the default requires additional steps to identify itself. It's not the variation, it's the standard.</quote> It's not that we always need to use cisgender. It exists for when it's important to distinguish. You don't go around referring to people as heterosexuals, but the term exists when it's relevant. You don't refer to milk as "whole milk" in normal conversation, but the distinction is used as necessary.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1