LogFAQs > #912199947

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	If romatisized racism is banned from games, then why isn't romantisized sexism?
Bogarskado 11/11/18 2:37:15 AM #33:	_Lyonidias posted... That body type is slightly unrealistic regardless of what she is intended upon portraying. This is interesting, how do you mean? HashtagTartarus posted... Bogarskado posted... HashtagTartarus posted... I would be fine with a man with a soft body wearing revealing clothing. Yes, it's sexualizing, but it's not inherently sexist. You very rarely see men, who are mercenaries or similar though profession, to have soft bodies. They're always athletic. We should fix that. Although I actually don't see why you're making a big deal about soft vs athletic bodies because a lot of people find athletic bodies sexy. Not on women. <cite>Bogarskado posted [p:912199947] in If romatis... [t:77191366]...</cite> <quote><cite>_Lyonidias posted...</cite> <quote>That body type is slightly unrealistic regardless of what she is intended upon portraying.</quote> This is interesting, how do you mean? <cite>HashtagTartarus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bogarskado posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HashtagTartarus posted...</cite> <quote>I would be fine with a man with a soft body wearing revealing clothing. Yes, it's sexualizing, but it's not inherently sexist.</quote> You very rarely see men, who are mercenaries or similar though profession, to have soft bodies. They're always athletic.</quote> We should fix that. Although I actually don't see why you're making a big deal about soft vs athletic bodies because a lot of people find athletic bodies sexy.</quote> Not on women.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1