LogFAQs > #910221

LurkerFAQs ( 06.29.2011-09.11.2012 ), Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAnd this is why Metacritic and review scores are bulls***.
redrocket
03/15/12 11:09:00 AM
#53:


DigitalIncision posted...
From: redrocket | #048
Any 'algorithm' you use would just be something that someone literally pulled straight out of their ass. This wouldn't be any better than metacritic and wouldn't help anything.
I don't mean a hard algorithm that we objectively put numbers into and pump out a score. I mean people who actually pay attention, gather feedback from users and even companies.

EDIT: The biggeest problem with Metacritic, to me, is the fact that there's no face there. There's nobody that can evaluate the process. They created a terrible way to do things years ago and it hasn't changed even the slightest bit.



You would be replacing a crappy objective method of aggregating scores with a crappy subjective one. The very concept of aggregate review scores is inherently flawed.

--
From his looks Magus is Macho Man Randy Savage as an anime zombie. The black wind howls, and one of you will snap into a Slim Jim ooh yeeeah! -sonicblastpunch
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1