LogFAQs > #906094392

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	No, libertarians are NOT compelled to support social media censorship [dwmf]
Tomba42 08/01/18 3:02:15 PM #24:	SmartMuffin posted... I'm saying that they wouldn't be motivated by politics. Once again though, disparate impact is legal precedent in the US. If you create an employment test that dramatically favors whites over blacks, the test is considered to be de facto racial discrimination, regardless of whether you intended it to be so or not. Has disparate impact been used in cases of things determined by choice, like political alignment or ice cream flavor? You're not going to be able to prosecute an ice cream parlor for favoring vanilla over chocolate ice cream the same way as race. --- Friend Foundation My cat likes to slap around uncooked spaghetti. -TwinBee <cite>Tomba42 posted [p:906094392] in No, libert... [t:76861389]...</cite> <quote><cite>SmartMuffin posted...</cite> <quote><quote> I'm saying that they wouldn't be motivated by politics. </quote> Once again though, disparate impact is legal precedent in the US. If you create an employment test that dramatically favors whites over blacks, the test is considered to be de facto racial discrimination, regardless of whether you intended it to be so or not.</quote> Has disparate impact been used in cases of things determined by choice, like political alignment or ice cream flavor? You're not going to be able to prosecute an ice cream parlor for favoring vanilla over chocolate ice cream the same way as race. --- Friend Foundation My cat likes to slap around uncooked spaghetti. -TwinBee</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1