I have decided that plum has done nothing this game of note. I feel for my buddy if things are bad outside the gaming forum, however, this mafia and I expect to play the dastardly game of mafia within it. I may strongly feel bad for a player, but I cannot give said player, no matter how magnificent or not, a free pass due to such circumstances.
For if one signs up for a mafia game, they are to play the game of mafia.
Thus, what has Masterplum done this game? I believe he has only, in his very sparse interaction, just basically threw down a guideline for day 1 in which he intends to sheep a player and lynch them no matter what later on if they continue to live, in a game where Red and Blade regularly draw early kills over Chris.
He also was kind enough, or unfortunate enough, to provide us with outside the game information which could be used to explain any erratic play possibly displayed and which would provide a perfect guise for lack of attachment and/or inactivity from the game.
Also, a subconscious pushing of guilt has been levied by the player onto those who may wish to lynch him because, I mean, how could you dare vote for someone in such an unfortunate situation.
I am aware my first vote of him was prior to this posting. I will admit my first vote of him was because of the usage of "master scum" repeatedly, and I, full of drunken merriment, though master scum really makes me think of master plum, as scum.
However, his entrance into the game and content have been found lacking. Thus, I assert he should be our lynch if he does not wish to provide more content and/or analysis which would be typically expected of him in this game of mafia.
Plum, to my bestest recollection, has always been one who tends to be less active as scum. I find his play through these mighty 24 hours to be quite alarming.