LogFAQs > #903948296

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Nintendo is not a top tier game developer. Not by a long shot...
LockeMonster 06/25/18 5:21:59 PM #176:	LinkPizza posted... I said I didnt go back and read everything. But I did say I read some. Also, I actually did read the post the first time through. You should read everything then. LinkPizza posted... Anyway, I remember you talking about them being conservative. And I also remember other people talking about how all companies are conservative is some places and not in others. And its true. I dont think being conservative is some places in automatically being cheap. Its just being safe. Just because I dont buy every game as soon as they come out, Im not cheap. Im making sure I have money for the things I need. Yes, that is why I changed it from cheap to conservative to better reflect what they do. Nonetheless, not including a charger is a cheap action when the system is $200 and the charger costs them $2 make. Almost all other companies include the required accessory. LinkPizza posted... I dont know anything about this charger, but its the one thing you keep mentioning. Its almost like you dont have many other examples, or else you would probably stop using that on every post... This is why you should read everything. I am not bringing up the charger again and again. The other guy keeps bringing it up and I'm responding to it. LinkPizza posted... Everybody sees games differently. You can say they lack whatever, but every games lacks something. And that can also change depending on the person. For me, I dont need an intricate story for something like Mario. Just say the bad guy does whatever, and let me go to a bunch of worlds and Mario my way though. As an example. For that, I dont see a huge story making it any better. It has enough... Ok, that's good for you. And likewise, there's others that would appreciate it, especially if Nintendo can do it right. LinkPizza posted... Having a different company philosophy would basically mean theyre not Nintendo anymore. Changing how Nintendo does business would not make them some other company. Companies restructure and change philosophies all the time and work towards improvement from there. LinkPizza posted... And people like their games Who said they don't? LinkPizza posted... If you dont like them, dont play them. They make great games. And are pretty much top tier. It doesnt mean theyre the very best, though a good number of people will say they are. Every company does things different. Which is better that way. More variety in games. I dont need Nintendo to try to make Zelda and Mario look more realistic or to add super deep stories. Zelda can have a deep story, but I just play it for the gameplay. Also, they might not be as conservative as you think. They add and change stuff for sequels quite often. Like how Uncharted changed a little with each new entry, they do the same for their sequels. I can't take you seriously after the whole "don't like em, don't play em" bit. That is such a childish and fanboyish way to look at things. And I'm actually a huge fan. I want things to get better. Not stay the same. The rest of your post is just the flawed view that fanboys have when discussing these topics. Hence why everyone is so defensive over this. --- "Scranton is great, but New York is like Scranton on acid. No, on speed. Nah. On steroids." FC: 3282-3258-0224 <cite>LockeMonster posted [p:903948296] in Nintendo i... [t:76745108]...</cite> <quote><cite>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>I said I didnt go back and read everything. But I did say I read some. Also, I actually did read the post the first time through.</quote> You should read everything then. <cite>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>Anyway, I remember you talking about them being conservative. And I also remember other people talking about how all companies are conservative is some places and not in others. And its true. I dont think being conservative is some places in automatically being cheap. Its just being safe. Just because I dont buy every game as soon as they come out, Im not cheap. Im making sure I have money for the things I need.</quote> Yes, that is why I changed it from cheap to conservative to better reflect what they do. Nonetheless, not including a charger is a cheap action when the system is $200 and the charger costs them $2 make. Almost all other companies include the required accessory. <cite>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>I dont know anything about this charger, but its the one thing you keep mentioning. Its almost like you dont have many other examples, or else you would probably stop using that on every post...</quote> This is why you should read everything. I am not bringing up the charger again and again. The other guy keeps bringing it up and I'm responding to it. <cite>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>Everybody sees games differently. You can say they lack whatever, but every games lacks something. And that can also change depending on the person. For me, I dont need an intricate story for something like Mario. Just say the bad guy does whatever, and let me go to a bunch of worlds and Mario my way though. As an example. For that, I dont see a huge story making it any better. It has enough... </quote> Ok, that's good for you. And likewise, there's others that would appreciate it, especially if Nintendo can do it right. <cite>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>Having a different company philosophy would basically mean theyre not Nintendo anymore. </quote> Changing how Nintendo does business would not make them some other company. Companies restructure and change philosophies all the time and work towards improvement from there. <cite>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>And people like their games</quote> Who said they don't? <cite>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>If you dont like them, dont play them. They make great games. And are pretty much top tier. It doesnt mean theyre the very best, though a good number of people will say they are. Every company does things different. Which is better that way. More variety in games. I dont need Nintendo to try to make Zelda and Mario look more realistic or to add super deep stories. Zelda can have a deep story, but I just play it for the gameplay. Also, they might not be as conservative as you think. They add and change stuff for sequels quite often. Like how Uncharted changed a little with each new entry, they do the same for their sequels.</quote> I can't take you seriously after the whole "don't like em, don't play em" bit. That is such a childish and fanboyish way to look at things. And I'm actually a huge fan. I want things to get better. Not stay the same. The rest of your post is just the flawed view that fanboys have when discussing these topics. Hence why everyone is so defensive over this. --- "Scranton is great, but New York is like Scranton on acid. No, on speed. Nah. On steroids." FC: 3282-3258-0224</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1